Homepage Fillable Basketball Evaluation Template

File Details

Fact Name Description
Evaluator The form requires the evaluator's name to ensure accountability and provide context for the assessment.
Player Information Details such as first name, last name, date of birth, grade, height, and weight are collected for identification and context.
Performance Categories Evaluation marks are provided for various performance categories, including shooting, defense, dribbling, rebounding, passing, athletic ability, game play, and coachability.
Rating Scale The rating scale ranges from 1 (needs improvement) to 5 (outstanding), allowing for a clear assessment of each skill.
Strengths Identification Overall strengths are identified by marking specific skills, helping to highlight areas of proficiency.
Comments Section A section for comments and recommendations allows evaluators to provide additional insights about the player's performance.
Offensive and Defensive Markings Evaluators are instructed to place an "O" for offensive success and an "X" for defensive success, indicating the player's strengths in game situations.
State-Specific Forms Some states may have specific requirements or governing laws that dictate the evaluation process and documentation.
Comprehensive Evaluation The form is designed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of a player's skills, facilitating targeted coaching and development.

Sample - Basketball Evaluation Form

Player Performance Evaluation

Evaluator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Player Information

Experience

First Name

 

Last Name

 

 

 

Date of Birth

 

Grade

 

 

 

Height

 

Weight

 

 

 

Evaluation

Mark rating for each category (1 = needs improvement; 5 = outstanding).

Shooting

__ Lay-up*

__ Mechanics & Arc* __ 2-point range __ 3-point range __ Catch & shoot __ Shoot off dribble __ Use of weak hand

Defense

__ Position* __ Transition* __ Stance __ On ball __ Off ball __ Closes out __ Help

__ Recover to man

Dribbling

__ Maintains control * __ Sees the court * __ Goes both ways __ Handles pressure __ Speed

__ Dribbles with purpose __ Penetrates to hoop

Rebounding

__ Anticipates *

__ Goes for the ball* __ Boxes out

__ Finds the right spot __ Protects/chins the ball

Passing

__ Timing* __ Catching *

__ Avoids turnovers __ 2 handed

__ 1 handed __ Bounce pass __ Overhead

Athletic Ability

__ Speed __ Quickness __ Stamina __ Coordination

Game Play

__ Court Sense

__ Team play / assists* __ Vision*

__ Anticipation*

Coachability

__ Attitude

__ Accepts criticism __ Focus

__ Interaction with teammates __ Team play

__ Work ethic

Overall Strengths*

__ Defense __ Dribbling __ Passing __ Rebounding __ Shooting __ Court sense

* check all that apply

Comments / Recommendations

Å Place an “O” where player would be most successful on offense.

Å Place an “X” where player would be most successful on defense.

Player Number

Rating scale:

Needs improvement

Below average

Average

Above average

Outstanding

Common mistakes

Filling out the Basketball Evaluation form can be straightforward, but several common mistakes can lead to inaccuracies. One frequent error is leaving sections blank. Each category, from shooting to defense, requires attention. Omitting a rating means missing out on providing a complete picture of the player's abilities.

Another common mistake is misunderstanding the rating scale. The form uses a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 means "needs improvement" and 5 signifies "outstanding." Misinterpreting these numbers can lead to skewed evaluations. For example, giving a player a 2 when they truly deserve a 4 can misrepresent their skills.

People often forget to check the applicable categories. The form includes several areas where evaluators can mark strengths with an asterisk. Failing to check these can overlook important aspects of a player’s game. It is essential to review each section carefully to ensure all relevant skills are acknowledged.

Another mistake involves not providing specific comments or recommendations. The comments section is an opportunity to highlight strengths and suggest areas for improvement. Without these notes, the evaluation may lack context, making it harder for coaches to understand the player's potential.

Some evaluators may also rush through the form, leading to hasty judgments. Taking the time to assess each skill accurately is crucial. Quick evaluations often miss nuances that could be significant in a player’s development.

Additionally, not considering the player's overall strengths can be a pitfall. The form asks for an overall assessment of skills like defense, dribbling, and shooting. Ignoring this section can result in a less comprehensive evaluation, which might affect future training decisions.

Lastly, failing to communicate with other coaches or evaluators can lead to inconsistencies. Collaborating with others who have observed the player can provide a more rounded view. This teamwork can enhance the accuracy of the evaluation, ensuring that all aspects of the player's performance are considered.